๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ฑ
๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ฑ
Inaccurate Baseline Program:
Utilizing an incorrect or poorly defined baseline program as the basis for analysis can skew the entire delay analysis. A robust baseline must be realistic, well-documented, and approved by all parties to serve as a credible benchmark.
Ignoring Contractual Terms:
Failure to fully understand and apply the contract provisions related to time, delay, and extensions can lead to inaccurate conclusions. This includes neglecting specific requirements for notice, substantiation of delays, and agreed-upon methodologies for delay analysis.
Improper Use of Delay Analysis Methodologies:
Inappropriately applying methodologies such as As-Planned vs. As-Built, Time Impact Analysis (TIA), Window Analysis, or Collapsed As-Built Analysis without considering their suitability for the project context can result in misleading findings.
Lack of Contemporaneous Records:
Not utilizing contemporaneous project records like daily reports, meeting minutes, emails, and photographs can undermine the analysis. These records provide critical evidence of actual progress and the conditions on-site, essential for an accurate delay analysis.
Failure to Differentiate Types of Delays:
Not distinguishing between critical and non-critical delays, or excusable vs. non-excusable delays, can lead to incorrect assessments of responsibility and entitlement. Only delays on the critical path impact the project completion date and warrant detailed analysis.
Overlooking Concurrency:
Ignoring concurrent delays or failing to properly analyze and apportion them can result in unfair allocations of responsibility. Concurrency occurs when two independent delays happen at the same time, and both impact the project’s critical path.
Incorrect Impact Calculations:
Miscalculating the impact of delays by either underestimating or overestimating the duration and effect on the critical path can distort the analysis. Accurate quantification requires detailed schedule analysis and an understanding of the projectโs logic ties and constraints.
Failure to Update the Program:
Analyzing delays based on an outdated or unapproved schedule can misrepresent the project status and the impact of delays. Regular updates reflecting the current progress and changes in project circumstances are essential.
Inadequate Consideration of Mitigation Measures:
Overlooking or inadequately considering the mitigation measures taken to minimize delays can result in an incomplete analysis. Analysts must evaluate whether reasonable steps were taken to reduce delay impacts.
Neglecting External Factors:
Ignoring external factors such as adverse weather conditions, force majeure events, or changes in laws/regulations can lead to inaccurate conclusions. These factors must be evaluated to determine their impact on the project schedule and delay entitlement.
Bแบกn tแบฃi tร i liแปu nรณi vแป 10 vแบฅn ฤแป quan trแปng thฦฐแปng bแป bแป qua trong phรขn tรญch sแปฑ chแบญm trแป cแปงa dแปฑ รกn xรขy dแปฑng
Uploaded files:- You need to login to have access to uploads.
